Spatial planning and airport regions: a critical review of governance, territorial tensions and development pressures
Published 5 Jan 2026 · Added to radar 5 Nov 2026
Source abstract
Airports increasingly function as territorial agents (shaping land use, influencing governance, and driving regional transformation). Their spatial impacts raise complex planning challenges. Drawing on 86 peer-reviewed sources published between 1997 and 2025, this study extends earlier reviews by incorporating post-COVID research and emerging debates on climate resilience, urban air mobility, and airport governance. Four thematic domains guide the synthesis: (i) planning frameworks and conceptual foundations; (ii) airport-regional dynamics, including economic, social, and environmental impacts; (iii) governance and institutional coordination; and (iv) emerging planning challenges, such as climate adaptation and advanced air mobility. The review adopts a thematic, qualitative approach rather than a systematic bibliometric method, emphasizing conceptual depth and policy relevance. The findings show that spatial planning systems often struggle to anticipate or manage the multi-scalar impacts of airport development, especially where governance structures are misaligned. Airports can catalyse regional change but also exacerbate spatial inequality and land-use conflict. The review concludes with a research agenda that prioritizes anticipatory governance, equity-centred planning, and the integration of spatial justice into airport-region development. By reframing airports as socio-territorial infrastructures embedded within multi-scalar governance systems, this study contributes to a more holistic understanding of how airports shape contemporary urban and regional geographies.
Abstract metadata supplied by the research index; wording belongs to the original source.Structured record
- Source-reported findings
- The findings show that spatial planning systems often struggle to anticipate or manage the multi-scalar impacts of airport development, especially where governance structures are misaligned.