Refugee Camps as Co-Produced Urban Systems: Governance, Spatial Violence, and Grassroots Agency in Protracted Displacement

Source abstract

Refugee camps have evolved from temporary shelters into permanent, complex urban systems, yet policy models often fail to address their long-term systemic marginality. To bridge this gap, this study conducts a comparative qualitative analysis of three protracted cases in the Middle East: Shatila (Lebanon), Yarmouk (Syria), and Jabalia (Gaza). Using a directed qualitative content analysis, the study evaluates secondary data, spatial reports, and institutional archives across five core System Pillars: Governance Configurations, Legal Regimes, Humanitarian Mediation, Spatial Violence, and Grassroots Agency. Findings show that conditions of urban exception are sustained by a self-reinforcing nexus of these processes. Furthermore, a dual-process model of refugee agency emerges, distinguishing short-term adaptive survival tactics (e.g., informal DIY utility grids) from constitutive practices of urban citizenship that reconfigure institutional aid protocols. In post-conflict contexts, physical destruction is systematically coupled with state-led property legislation to enforce permanent displacement. We conclude that protracted camps must be recognized as dynamic, co-produced urban systems rather than static zones of exception. Effectively breaking cycles of socio-spatial marginalization requires international actors to transition from short-term emergency assistance to rights-based metabolic planning, legal tenure protection, and formalized institutional co-production frameworks.