UrbanStudyUrban Research Radar
Land Use & Urban Form
Journal articleOpen access

Structuring the Causal Hierarchy of Urban Sprawl in Iran: Governance, Market, and Infrastructure Drivers in Metropolitan Regions

Published 8 Jun 2026 · Added to radar 5 Nov 2026

Source abstract

Urban sprawl in Iran has previously been examined through spatial measurement, driver classification, and multi-criteria weighting approaches. However, less attention has been given to the hierarchical structure through which governance, market, infrastructure, demographic, and regulatory conditions reinforce one another over time. This study develops a structural interpretation of urban sprawl in Iran’s major metropolitan regions by integrating expert refinement of key drivers with Interpretive Structural Modeling and MICMAC analysis. Rather than ranking drivers by relative importance, the analysis identifies their causal positioning within the wider sprawl system. The findings show that institutional fragmentation, weak enforcement capacity, and limited metropolitan coordination occupy the deepest structural levels, shaping downstream outcomes such as speculative land development, infrastructure-led peripheral expansion, housing pressure, and the growth of outlying settlements. The study contributes to urban-sprawl scholarship by reframing Iranian metropolitan expansion as a governance-embedded spatial process and by identifying leverage points for coordinated intervention. Policy responses should therefore prioritize institutional alignment, enforceable growth-management mechanisms, and infrastructure investment that supports compact rather than dispersed metropolitan development.

Abstract metadata supplied by the research index; wording belongs to the original source.

Structured record

Study objective (from source abstract)
This study develops a structural interpretation of urban sprawl in Iran’s major metropolitan regions by integrating expert refinement of key drivers with Interpretive Structural Modeling and MICMAC analysis.
Source-reported findings
  • The findings show that institutional fragmentation, weak enforcement capacity, and limited metropolitan coordination occupy the deepest structural levels, shaping downstream outcomes such as speculative land development, infrastructure-led peripheral expansion, housing pressure, and the growth of outlying settlements.

Read the original ↗ DOI ↗